<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deckers Outdoor Corporation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movethemarkets.com/blog/2007/03/10/deckers-outdoor-corporation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movethemarkets.com/blog/2007/03/10/deckers-outdoor-corporation/</link>
	<description>Futures Trading, Custom Programming, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:12:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breakout Play: Federated Department Stores (NYSE: FD) -- Move the Markets</title>
		<link>http://www.movethemarkets.com/blog/2007/03/10/deckers-outdoor-corporation/comment-page-1/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>Breakout Play: Federated Department Stores (NYSE: FD) -- Move the Markets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movethemarkets.com/blog/2007/03/10/deckers-outdoor-corporation/#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>[...] may have seen a comment I put on one of Phileo&#8217;s recent posts, where I talk about selling into the first surge on the stock. This is another example of how I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may have seen a comment I put on one of Phileo&#8217;s recent posts, where I talk about selling into the first surge on the stock. This is another example of how I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phileo</title>
		<link>http://www.movethemarkets.com/blog/2007/03/10/deckers-outdoor-corporation/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>
		<dc:creator>Phileo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movethemarkets.com/blog/2007/03/10/deckers-outdoor-corporation/#comment-2346</guid>
		<description>@Richard: Yeah, I was thinking about that too - after I had sold!  There&#039;s often a pullback after a big surge like the one on Monday.  The pullback would have offered me plenty of chance to get back in.  I&#039;ll have to keep that in mind for the next trade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard: Yeah, I was thinking about that too &#8211; after I had sold!  There&#8217;s often a pullback after a big surge like the one on Monday.  The pullback would have offered me plenty of chance to get back in.  I&#8217;ll have to keep that in mind for the next trade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.movethemarkets.com/blog/2007/03/10/deckers-outdoor-corporation/comment-page-1/#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movethemarkets.com/blog/2007/03/10/deckers-outdoor-corporation/#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>This is something I see all the time, and I&#039;m not sure what&#039;s the right conclusion to make.  But, here&#039;s a case where you could have gotten out after 45 minutes for the same gain you eventually made several days later.  It seems like, when I wait for a clear, confirmed reversal, or use a trailing stop, it eats up so much in gains that I&#039;m just as well off selling into the first big surge.  So, most of the time that&#039;s what I do.  I know there have been cases where the stock went on to run without me, but I also know there have been lots of cases where I won instead of lost due to this strategy.  So, it&#039;s not clear to me which method is better.

On the post itself: There were weird &lt;font&gt; tags in the headings, which I stripped out.  And, try not to put the chart image inside the first heading, as it causes the formatting to go wonky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is something I see all the time, and I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s the right conclusion to make.  But, here&#8217;s a case where you could have gotten out after 45 minutes for the same gain you eventually made several days later.  It seems like, when I wait for a clear, confirmed reversal, or use a trailing stop, it eats up so much in gains that I&#8217;m just as well off selling into the first big surge.  So, most of the time that&#8217;s what I do.  I know there have been cases where the stock went on to run without me, but I also know there have been lots of cases where I won instead of lost due to this strategy.  So, it&#8217;s not clear to me which method is better.</p>
<p>On the post itself: There were weird <font> tags in the headings, which I stripped out.  And, try not to put the chart image inside the first heading, as it causes the formatting to go wonky.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.466 seconds -->
