Apr 19

This post was contributed by a guest author, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Richard or MovetheMarkets.com


I closed my SPY trade today for a modest gain. I didn’t see much opportunity for Trader- X type plays. Prospectus saw a good one with SMSI though. Unfortunately we both missed it. Big gap days like these I like to let the market settle down before taking any dummy trades.
SPY OMNI Trade:
19-apr-spy-2.PNG


This post was contributed by a guest author, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Richard or MovetheMarkets.com


Apr 10

It was sloooow going today in the markets. At least, from my vantage point, anyway. The only thing I could find that seemed to have any force behind it was Seagate Technology (NYSE: STX). So, I traded it twice!

This is one of those rare days where I manage to trade both long and short on the same stock on the same day. Feels all “professional” :-)

The first trade was a scalp based on a deformed descending triangle formation. I played it as a scalp since it wasn’t too well-formed, and because it wasn’t near breaking its opening range low. Here’s the 15-min chart showing the shape I was watching:

Read the rest of this entry »

Stocks Mentioned In This Article
StockLinks
STX | |
Mar 27

This post was contributed by a guest author, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Richard or MovetheMarkets.com


I traded D.R. Horton, Inc. (NYSE: DHI) as an OR breakout short. I saw all of the homebuilders getting whacked after news of Lennar’s 73% profit decline. I used my trade box limits as I discussed yesterday. This one set up early, so I only had a bit over an hour for the trade to move. I didn’t have to wait that long, though: Read the rest of this entry »

Stocks Mentioned In This Article
StockLinks
DHI | |

This post was contributed by a guest author, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Richard or MovetheMarkets.com


Mar 27

I love twitter (have you seen twittervision? It just mesmerizes me… I keep telling myself I’ll stop watching after just a few more). But today, I was almost too twitter-happy for my own good! As I was posting about AMLN and GME, damn it if I didn’t miss my entry on GME! But, countless hours of chart-watching taught me how to get in, anyway (ok, and a smidge of luck) (but mostly skill) (but if it hadn’t worked out it would have been entirely bad luck).

Here’s the 15min chart, where I’ve thoughtfully pointed out the dummy candle that I planned to play against:

GME 15min

So, when I looked back from my twitter screen to my chart, it was already at 31.20. My desired entry was 31.10. Since I wasn’t going to bet that it would actually break the OR high, I didn’t like the Risk:Reward ratio getting in at that 31.20 level. So, I watched, and two minutes later got what I was wishing for… a brief drop down to my entry level. I saw the bid hit 31.11, and the trade frequency dropped way off for a couple seconds.

That often happens, and I imagine it’s because a lot of traders who weren’t distracting themselves surely got in the stock at 31.10ish. So, when the bid gets there, they all have to think for a second about whether they want to risk being in the red or not. Or maybe I’m completely off base. But whatever is actually happening at these points, I’ve seen them a huge number of times, and I felt the odds of a run back up to at least the 31.20 level were good (and then you have another decision point, as people that did buy in up there are now breaking even… do they get out or stay in the game?).

1-minute chart of the trade:

GME 1min

This is the type of decision you really can’t hesitate about. As soon as I got my order in, prints started going off, and I was filled at 31.135. And, about 20 seconds later, I got out at 31.32. I reported on twitter that it was 1R, but when I added it up the partial fills later it turned out to be only 0.95R. Still, not bad for ugly days like we’ve been having lately!

If you glance back up at that 15min chart, you’ll see that it never went more than 1 or 2 cents higher than my exit point. That always feels spectacular. You might ask why I choose that point for my exit. After all, isn’t the OR high closer to 31.45? Well as I wrote waaaaay back in July of 2006, I like to drill down to low-level charts to see what’s really going on. I don’t always do it, but especially when I’m trading long on a down day, for instance, I’m more apt to think about that.

Anyway, on that 1-minute chart, you can see that the stock was never above 31.30 for more than a fraction of a single 1-minute candle (all the prices above 31.30 are just wicks). So, for my purposes, 31.30 felt more like the true price to beat. And, today, I wasn’t going to bet on it.

I wish I were seeing more trades to take, but I’ve been making pretty consistent trades every couple days, anyway. It adds up, but doesn’t have the thrill of a big winner. Would be nice to have one of those this week. We’ll see!

Mar 20

Today I finally followed through on something I’ve been meaning to do for a long time… I’ve been wanting to increase my position size as my trades go in my favor (sometimes called “pressing” winning trades). A lot of people (including me, not long ago) reduce their positions over the course of a trade to take partial profits. I stopped doing this a while back, because I found that I rarely sold the second half at a higher price. So, it was actually making me less money, with more time in the markets, and more commissions. Since then, I’ve wanted to try the opposite and press my winners (I even mentioned it waaay back in my StockTickr interview last August). But, I’ve rarely had winning trades that lasted more than a few minutes! So, I haven’t had many opportunities to practice.

The Trade

Today, I made a trade on VAL on a break of a narrow-range candle just under the HOD. I actually waited for the price to clear the high before getting in the trade. This was around 28.70. My fill wasn’t great (average price of 28.725), but I actually took this as a good sign, since it never hurts to have lots of buying on a breakout.

I expected there to be some resistance at 28.75 (minor round number), but once we cleared that I thought we’d go straight to 29. Well, the price did stall at 28.75, as expected, but just momentarily. As the price was pushing through that level, the overall indices were all pushing to new highs, and the TICK was in the 800’s and above. I thought, there will never be a better time to try pressing a trade. So, I bought more as the price reached 28.76. I got another sucky fill, at 28.79. This time, though, I was less pleased, because I didn’t see any volume to go with it. Instead, this felt like one of those empty “you are about to be screwed” fills… the kind where the specialist makes easy money off you and all you can do is watch.

VAL Trade

Press Reasonably!

Of course, it goes without saying that when you press a trade, you should also raise your maximum stop-loss point (otherwise, your maximum risk is more than your original risk, which is a no-no. There’s some subtlety to it, because you always want your stop loss to be at a reasonable point, in terms of the price action, so that has a major influence on how many additional shares you can safely buy. I asked myself, “if this trade stays healthy, what’s the lowest I’d expect it to fall?” I thought it shouldn’t go back below the previous HOD, at this point. Anything up to that would still be reasonably healthy, though (pullbacks to the breakout point are pretty common, after all). So, I made sure my revised stop loss was just under that point (28.68ish).

The Trade Continues

Well, as I expected after my “fuck you” fill, the price fell from 28.80 a good bit before rising again. Not too scary, but not fun either. I breathed a little easier when we cleared 28.75 again. At this point, I again asked myself, “what do I expect to see, if this is still a healthy trade?” I decided, this is only a healthy trade if it can make another new high. If it stalls out again at 28.80, I’m getting out.

Well, we reached 28.80, and prints started becoming awfully infrequent. When the ask fell back to 28.79, I sold my entire position. I got yet another ugly fill, at 28.76. Good grief, you’d never know this stock was doing twice its normal volume, and over a million shares! All in all, I made 0.02 R. Thanks for playing! Better luck next time!

As you can see on the chart, the price did nothing but fall after my exit. It always feels good when that happens…. makes you feel like you knew what you were doing!

Mar 16

Guess it’s paper food again tonight! :-) You get used to it.

I thought this looked pretty good. I bought at the top of the last green candle. The ‘dummy’ candle was the one before it (which I’ve thoughtfully pointed out with an arrow on the chart. No thanks necessary. Just doin’ my job, ma’am).

CBG Trade

It really looked to me, based on the T&S, that 34.60 was about to break. But, it didn’t matter what I thought. My first warning was that, not only did I not get filled at 34.60… I actually got filled at 34.59! Big seller sitting on that level, as I was to find out soon enough. It tried a couple more times to break through, then fell like a stone. Which, all things considered, is the way I prefer to be stopped out. Like a bandaid… one swift motion… right off! It sucked that there was so much selling that I took a 1.14R hit instead of 1R, but that’s the way it goes.

Mar 13

As mentioned via twitter, I made a 0.5R trade on Qualcomm Inc. (Nasdaq: QCOM) a few minutes ago. This was (to me, anyway) a pretty standard-looking dummy setup. A gap up, a drop, and a turnaround on an inside NR3 candle just as the 5MA is catching up to the price. The top of the dummy candle was 41.45, but I waited for it to clear round number 41.50 before getting in. That’s safer. Since the markets were still trading within yesterday’s range, and we were having what appears to be a negative day, I was extra interested in “safe.”

qcom trade

Because of that, and because I expected a bit of a pop through the round number, I decided I’d rather scalp it. Since I was entering a few cents above the dummy candle, I put my stop at the top of the dummy candle, instead of the bottom like I normally would. I jumped out for twice that risk, or 10 cents. In my StockTickr journal, I’ll record it as 0.5 R, because I made about the same money as half my typical risk amount for a full-fledged trade. That’s how I always record scalps… otherwise I’d be reporting 40 to 50 R some months, even though I didn’t make near that much money. Scalps are like that, since you try to only risk 1 or 2 cents to get 10 or 20.

Of course, my fears were a bit too extreme, as QCOM did run up further, and would have made a decent full-fledged trade. Oh, well…

Stocks Mentioned In This Article
StockLinks
QCOM | |
Mar 9

Today was a choppy, boring day where I could find few opportunities, despite being fully awake for once. :-) I would have dwelled on it, but the Trading Goddess said to get over it, so I did.

If you track my twitter feed, you already know that I took one trade today, on CVS Corporation (NYSE: CVS). Let’s take a look at it:

CVS Trade Friday

What did I see?

  • A failing gap up that was finding support above the OR low.
  • It was starting to make higher highs and higher lows, and the 5MA had caught up with it.
  • Lots and lots of volume (it finished with 302% of its normal volume).

What did I want to see?

  • A re-test of the OR high

Unfortunately, I got in a little late. I’d have ideally gotten in at 32.68, but at my actual entry the risk was still well under 1% of the stock price (which is my rule of thumb for how much is too much). And, even more unfortunately, the price did not rise as fast as I had envisioned. When the action started to get a bit dicey about halfway to my target, I bailed. Flat, choppy, friday markets are not the time for blind faith in some trade’s follow-through.

As you can see on the chart, I didn’t get out quite at the top of the move (it topped out about 5 cents higher), but I was correct in assuming we were going to be stuck in that range for a while. Turns out, the stock never ran. So, I am very happy with this trade, overall.

I tossed out a couple other ideas via twitter, but didn’t take any of them, myself. If you were more brave than I was, and quick to take profits, you could have made some nice money on CDWC, for instance. I just didn’t think this was a good day for speculation against the trend, even for a scalp.

I hope your day was profitable! Be careful out there…

Stocks Mentioned In This Article
StockLinks
CVS | |
Feb 6

I don’t know about you, but I have found very few interesting opportunities the last two days. It could be because I am so sleepy (my sleep schedule is all messed up again) (again). I think all my paintbar indicators are keeping me out of trouble, because they don’t get sleepy like I do! When I’m tired, I know I shouldn’t even think about a trade unless my indicators have perked up about something.

So, here’s my one and only trade today. I had mostly decided to take the day off, since the indices are still so range-bound. But, Digital River Inc (Nasdaq: DRIV) gave me several good reasons to make a short trade. Let’s look at the chart:

driv short play

A number of things were stacked in this trade’s favor:

  1. It was doing about 1.5x normal volume
  2. It had just made a new 30-day low, and didn’t immediately pop back up (it was one of my 30-Day Low Watchlist stocks for today)
  3. It had just entered a volatility expansion phase (see the blue-grey “consolidation” paintbars at the bottom turning red)
  4. It set up a dummy-style entry (see blue arrow paintbar)
  5. Round number 49.50 sat between my entry and my stop-loss point

With all that piled, up, and only a very lackluster range-bound market to hold me back, I got in short. After which, a wave of buying programs swept in, pushing the TICKs way up. I was almost ready to hop back out, but the TRINs weren’t budging, and the stock wasn’t breaking above round number 49.50. Sure enough, once the buying stopped, the sellers stepped in to drive DRIV back down. So down DRIV was driven, when big bad bids started showing up at 49.14. This was about 1.5 R on a crappy day, so I decided to take it.

I blame my sleepiness for the fact that I didn’t notice the spread was 7 cents wide when I sent my market order (maybe I need a paintbar for that!). I bet, had I used a limit order, I could have split the spread instead of eating it. Oh well. On the other hand, sometimes it just invites more bidders to one-up me, and I end up having to change to a market order anyway.

Oh yeah, and…

I was too sleepy to write about it, but I had a fairly quick 1R loss yesterday on PTEN (you can see the chart on stocktickr, which saves charts of all my trades, whether I am alert enough to blog about them or not). It was pretty uninteresting… I thought it would go higher… I took a low-risk entry… I was up about 0.8 R before it turned around and stopped me out. I think it fell most of the day after that, too.

So, up 1.35R today, down 1R yesterday… meaning I’m only slightly up for the week. I think it’s going to be like this (up a little, down a little) until the markets break out of their ranges. DIA had nearly an inside day today, as of 3:44PM EST. Unacceptable!

Stocks Mentioned In This Article
StockLinks
DRIV | |
Feb 4

I’ve been putting just about everything that needs measurement or arithmetic into paintbars on QuoteTracker. I’m pretty excited about making use of them next week. Most of them won’t mean anything to you, but I did make one that tries to help me spot the “dummy”-style trade entry. I thought that might be worth sharing. I’m not the Dummy authority–it’s relatively rare when I make those plays–but I codified the kind of thing I look for, anyway. I reviewed my old trades, and the dummy-a-day category at uglychart to decide what I wanted to highlight.

As with any indicator I make, I want to catch as many winning signals as possible, without painting the whole chart with noise. It’s a balance you have to strike, between catching everything that could possibly be a signal, and missing a lot of good signals. People probably have different tastes in this regard. To me, painting every narrow bar is too many paintbars to deal with. But, if I make sure it’s near a moving average, and facing the right way, etc… well, then I have few enough alerts that I can browse them effectively.

So, here’s what I came up with:

For longs:

  1. Inside NR3
  2. Bar is at most 1% wide
  3. Closes above 5MA
  4. 5MA is at most 0.15% below the low of the bar
  5. 5MA is rising for the last 3 bars

…and just invert the directional stuff for shorts:

  1. Inside NR3
  2. Bar is at most 1% wide
  3. Closes below 5MA
  4. 5MA is at most 0.15% above the high of the bar
  5. 5MA is falling for the last 3 bars

Forcing it to be an inside bar drops a lot of meaningless signals, but also gets rid of a fair amount of example winners. So, that was hard to decide. I could possibly make the rule such that it has to be “mostly” inside, like it can peek out in the direction of the expected trade by 0.1% or something. But, for now, I’m sticking with a strict inside bar policy.

I made two separate paintbars for the ‘long’ and ’short’ cases, so that I could paint longs above the candle, and shorts below it. Here’s an example (if you aren’t familiar with how dummy trades work, you would enter the bar after the arrow, if the price goes outside the arrow-bar in the right direction):

dummy example

Here’s the code for longs:

if (SMA(5) > SMA(5)[1]) AND (SMA(5)[1] > SMA(5)[2]) AND (SMA(5) >= (Bar Low - (Bar Low * 0.0015))) AND (SMA(5) < Bar Close) AND (Bar High-Bar Low) <= (Bar High[2]-Bar Low[2]) AND (Bar High-Bar Low) <= (Bar High[3]-Bar Low[3]) AND (Bar High<=Bar High[1]) AND (Bar Low>=Bar Low[1]) AND ((Bar High - Bar Low) <= (Bar High * 0.01)) set color to Blue

… and shorts:

if (SMA(5) < SMA(5)[1]) AND (SMA(5)[1] < SMA(5)[2]) AND (SMA(5) <= (Bar High + (Bar High * 0.0015))) AND (SMA(5) > Bar Close) AND (Bar High-Bar Low) <= (Bar High[2]-Bar Low[2]) AND (Bar High-Bar Low) <= (Bar High[3]-Bar Low[3]) AND (Bar High<=Bar High[1]) AND (Bar Low>=Bar Low[1]) AND ((Bar High - Bar Low) <= (Bar High * 0.01)) set color to Blue

Aug 19

Tell me where this line of reasoning breaks down…. it’s just a thought experiment I did a moment ago.. I’ll take you through it, in the order I thought of things.

I’ve heard that a typical dummy trader (see here for examples if you have no idea what that means) has a 40 to 45% win rate. That means, if I take the other side of those trades, I should have a 55 to 60% win rate, as long as I always take profits at 1 R (where the dummy trader would have been stopped out). Luckily, with that kind of win rate, 1 R per winning trade is all I need to have a positive expectancy.

Of course, 1 R at 55% win rate isn’t going to amount to a whole lot of money unless I can find a whole lot of anti-dummy trades to take. But, what about this

What if I set up two trading accounts. And, I always simultaneously entered my dummy trade and my anti-dummy trades? Then, when the dummy trade is stopped out, my anti-dummy trade mostly cancels out the loss (slippage and commissions make it not perfect). When the dummy trade works, 1 R of profit is cancelled out because of the loss I take on the anti-dummy trade. Again, it won’t be perfect due to the times the winner turns too fast, and you win less than 1 R on the dummy trade. But, overall, shouldn’t I come out a little richer (by like 10 R to 20 R per 100 trades) this way?

Even better than a little more profit, is the fact that my drawdowns should be pretty darn shallow. By definition, losing streaks in my dummy trades have equivalent winning streaks in my anti-dummy trades. Right?

Come to think of it, doesn’t it stand to reason that this scheme improves the profitability and consistency of any system that wins less than 50%? The lower the win rate, the more it helps. I’ve read that there are some trend following systems out there with like 20% or less win rates… in that case taking the anti-trades too would mean an extra 60 R per 100 trades, or so. Seems like that would make the drawdowns on those trend-following systems much more bearable, right?

I think I read about FX traders doing something like this, getting long and short the same position in two accounts… can’t recall where at the moment, though. Do any stock traders out there do it?